AI Economy

Where AI Inherits the Tempo of Infrastructure

Unit 28

06 Jan 2026 — 1 min read

Not all AI scales by code. Some of it scales by permits, steel, and time.

Sequence Cannot Be Skipped

AI is often discussed as software, but parts of its development now resemble heavy industry. Not in appearance, but in constraint. Progress is no longer gated by models alone, but by power, land, transmission, permits, and timelines that do not compress on demand.

High-voltage transmission lines take years to plan and build. Grid connection permits move through environmental review, public hearings, and land acquisition. Transformers sit in multi-year queues. Power purchase agreements are signed decades in advance.

These are not bottlenecks that respond to urgency. They respond to sequence.

Capacity Before Use

As compute density rises, so does the character of dependency. A single AI rack now draws orders of magnitude more power than traditional data infrastructure. Scaling no longer means deploying more code. It means securing capacity that exists outside the software stack entirely.

This is why timelines matter more than intentions. Infrastructure does not wait for clarity. It requires commitment before certainty, contracts before demand, positioning before use.

In this regime, access becomes uneven. Regions with excess generation, permissive permitting, or legacy grid slack absorb growth. Others wait, not because demand is absent, but because sequence cannot be skipped.

The result is a divergence that looks technical but behaves structural. Development concentrates where power, land, and regulatory throughput already align. Optimization follows availability, not the other way around.

Where Progress Becomes Uneven

Once development crosses this threshold, progress stops being elastic. It inherits the tempo of steel, concrete, and right-of-way.

Not everything called AI belongs to this category. But the parts that do will not be limited by imagination. They will be limited by systems that were never designed to move quickly.

The Decoupling of Pressure

A strange mismatch has taken shape around artificial intelligence. At conferences and in interviews, the people building AI repeat the same urgent concerns: power is tight, compute is stretched, and expansion is hitting physical limits. Yet, everyday use tells a completely different story. When people open AI tools today, they

When Absence Becomes Unaffordable

Some arrangements, once they are put into operation, no longer treat exit as a reversible move. Not because departure is forbidden, but because returning after a position is lost becomes prohibitively expensive. Power purchase agreements extend across decades. Transformer orders sit in queues measured in years. Grid connection permits, once

From Tariffs to Optionality: How Policy Risk Is Repricing Corporate Value

Markets continue to rely on familiar signals such as growth, margins, execution, and competitive position. What has become less stable is the context in which these signals are interpreted. Increasingly, they are assessed alongside constraints that sit outside the firm’s control, and policy-driven uncertainty is one of them. The

How a Narrow Ruling Could Reshape Global Policy Risk

The Supreme Court case over Trump’s emergency trade powers is not only about tariffs. It is about whether temporary legal tools can be converted into standing economic policy. At stake is the interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, a statute passed in 1977 to give

Read more

The Decoupling of Pressure

When Absence Becomes Unaffordable

From Tariffs to Optionality: How Policy Risk Is Repricing Corporate Value

How a Narrow Ruling Could Reshape Global Policy Risk